London Borough of Haringey (25 020 748)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Aug 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the priority the Council awarded to Miss X’s application for social housing. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains that the Council failed to properly consider her circumstances when it awarded Band C priority to her application for social housing.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X applied for social housing. The Council awarded Band C because Miss X is overcrowded by one bedroom. Miss X asked for a review of the Council’s decision and it decided she would remain in Band C.
  2. We are not an appeal body. That means we do not take a fresh look at a decision and decide if it was wrong. Our role is to consider whether there was any fault in the decision making process. If there was no fault in the decision making, we cannot question the outcome.
  3. The Council’s review decision sets out the relevant sections of its allocations policy. It explains the evidence Miss X provided including about her medical needs and the impact of anti-social behaviour in her building. The decision applies the evidence to the Council’s policy. It decided Miss X met the criteria for Band C. It is unlikely an investigation would find fault with the Council’s decision making and so we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings