What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Brighton & Hove City Council (25 018 020)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s assessment of her housing priority. There is insufficient evidence of fault in the Council’s decision-making to justify our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council has not properly considered her family’s housing priority. She says her current home is overcrowded and negatively impacts her child’s medical condition and development.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)
  2. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X asked the Council to review her housing priority because her family of five live in an overcrowded two-bedroom flat and her youngest child has additional needs which are negatively affected by the overcrowding.
  2. The evidence suggests the Council considered all the supporting information provided, including a supporting letter from her doctor and it decided Mrs X should be awarded a band B medical priority.
  3. We are not an appeal body. It is not our role to say whether the Council’s decision was correct. Unless there was fault in the Council’s decision-making process, we cannot comment on the decision reached. The law says councils must allocate social housing in line with their published allocation scheme.
  4. The Council considered the information Mrs X provided about her circumstances and its own allocation scheme when decision making. There is also not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s decision-making process to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault in the Council’s decision-making to justify our involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings