Spelthorne Borough Council (25 005 000)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Jan 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s assessment of Miss X’s application for housing as it is unlikely we will find fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains about the Council’s decision that she has no local connection to the area and the impact this has had on its decision on her priority for housing. Miss X says this has caused her extreme stress and feelings of displacement.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council. I have considered the Council’s housing allocations policy.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council has a housing allocations policy which aims to ensure that social housing in the borough is allocated fairly and objectively, in accordance with relevant laws and regulations. Priority for housing is assessed against several criteria including whether a local connection is present and medical need.
  2. The Council accepted Miss X on to its housing register on medical grounds, but her priority was reduced due to Miss X having not lived in the area long enough to have established a local connection.
  3. Under the Council’s allocations policy, this is a decision the Council was entitled to make. We could only criticise it if there was fault in how it was made. From the records I have seen, the Council took account of Miss X’s personal circumstances, including her daughter’s attendance at school in the area, Miss X’s work patterns and whether there were exceptional circumstances to her case. As such, while I recognise Miss X is unhappy with the Council’s decision, I consider it is unlikely we will find fault in it, and we will not therefore investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because it is unlikely we will find fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings