Amber Valley Borough Council (25 004 019)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Sep 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision about Mrs X’s housing priority. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify us investigating.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained the Council has not considered her housing priority correctly.
  2. Mrs X said the Council decided to marginally increase her priority banding despite the medical evidence she presented about her child. Mrs X said that she is concerned about her child’s wellbeing at her current home.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council considered Mrs X’s housing priority and decided that her banding would recognise medium medical needs for her child.
  2. When responding to Mrs X’s review requests, the Council confirmed that its banding decision was correct and in line with its housing allocations policy.
  3. The Ombudsman may not find fault with a council’s assessment of a housing applicant’s priority if it has carried this out in line with its published allocations scheme.
  4. I have reviewed the Council’s housing allocations policy. Mrs X appears to be banded correctly for medium medical needs.
  5. The Ombudsman recognises the demand for social housing far outstrips the supply of properties in many areas. The Ombudsman may not find fault with a council for failing to re-house someone, if it has prioritised applicants and allocated properties according to its published lettings scheme policy.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify us investigating.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings