North Devon District Council (25 001 426)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about her housing register priority banding. There is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains the Council did not fully consider her circumstances when deciding her housing register priority banding. She says this has caused distress and put her and her family at risk. She wants the Council to increase her housing register priority and provide her with suitable housing.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council’s housing allocations policy states it will accept a housing register application from persons outside the Devon area, where it is satisfied the person is fleeing domestic abuse. It says where it considers that private renting is an appropriate and available option, the applicant will be placed in Band D.
  2. Ms X applied to join the Council’s housing register on safety grounds. The Council was satisfied she needed to move due to domestic abuse and accepted her application. It placed her in Band D. It said its housing team was currently working with her to consider private rented accommodation. If it concluded that private rented accommodation was not possible or appropriate for her, it would review her priority banding.
  3. We will not investigate this complaint. The Council’s priority banding decision appears in line with its policy and so it is unlikely an investigation would lead to a finding of fault. There is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.
  4. The Council has told us it’s housing team is currently working with Ms X and relevant agencies to determine whether it can provide her with safe emergency housing in its area. If Ms X is dissatisfied with the housing team’s actions, it is open to her to make a new complaint about this.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings