Spelthorne Borough Council (25 001 015)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Sep 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s assessment of a housing application. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr and Mrs X complained about the Council’s assessment of their housing application. They believe that the Council failed to give sufficient priority to their medical circumstances and that they should be given Band A priority rather than Band B which they have been awarded.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information provided by the complainant and the Council’s review responses. I have also considered the Council’s housing allocations policy.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr and Mrs X say that the Council did not properly assess their housing needs related to their medical circumstances. They say that they provided medical evidence that they need to move because they cannot cope with stairs in their current home.
  2. The Council’s independent medical assessor recommended that the application should be banded Band B which is for an urgent move on medical grounds. The Council told them that they do not meet the threshold for Band A which is reserved for medical emergencies only and is reviewed every 6 months when awarded.
  3. The Ombudsman is not an appeal body. This means we do not take a second look at a decision to decide if it was wrong. Instead, we look at the processes an organisation followed to make its decision. If we consider it followed those processes correctly, we cannot question whether the decision was right or wrong, regardless of whether someone disagrees with the decision the organisation made.
  4. I have considered the Council’s housing allocations policy and there is no evidence to suggest that the application was treated differently to any other applicant in these circumstances. We may not find fault with a council’s assessment of a housing application/ a housing applicant’s priority if it has carried this out in line with its published allocations scheme. We recognise that the demand for social housing far outstrips the supply of properties in many areas.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s assessment of a housing application. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings