London Borough of Tower Hamlets (24 020 603)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Apr 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the complainant’s priority on the housing register. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Ms X, says she is facing eviction, living in a mouldy property and should be in a higher band on the housing register.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council. This includes the complaint correspondence. I also considered our Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X lives alone in a one bedroom ground floor flat which she rents from a private landlord. Ms X is on the housing register, in band three, and can bid for properties for people aged over 50 and for sheltered accommodation. The Council made two offers of sheltered accommodation which Ms X declined. The Council confirmed band three is the correct band.
  2. Ms X says there is damp and mould in the flat. She has multiple disabilities and says she should be in a higher band. The Council did an assessment for medical priority in 2024 but decided she does not qualify. It invited her to re-apply if her heath has deteriorated.
  3. The Council explained it is the landlord’s responsibility to deal with the damp and it signposted her to support if the landlord does not do repairs. The Council says Ms X refused access to the landlord and to the Council to do an inspection.
  4. The Council says it has not seen any evidence the landlord is about to evict Ms X as she has alleged.
  5. I will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. I have checked the allocations policy and the Council’s decision to award band 3 flows from the evidence and the policy. The Council assessed Ms X’s medical needs but decided the flat is not having a detrimental impact on her health. However, it invited her to reapply if her health gets worse.
  6. The Council has provided appropriate advice about the mould and Ms X can pursue this further if she allows access to the landlord and other Council services.
  7. The Council has not seen any evidence the landlord is trying to evict Ms X. But, if this is the case, Ms X can ask the Council’s homelessness service for help and provide evidence of the eviction.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings