London Borough of Hillingdon (24 016 172)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 05 Mar 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We have upheld Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s decision on her banding level in her housing application. The Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains about the Council’s decision on her banding level in her housing application. She says the Council has not properly considered her medical needs.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. If there has been fault which has caused significant injustice, or that could cause injustice to others in the future we may suggest a remedy.(Local Government Act 1974, sections 26(1) and 26A(1), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Miss X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. If we investigated this complaint, it is likely that we would find the Council at fault. It has failed to evidence its rationale or decision making behind the current effect Miss X’s housing has upon her health, in line with its policy.
  2. We therefore invited the Council to consider remedying the injustice this caused by apologising and completing a further medical assessment. It should provide a clear rationale to Miss X regarding its subsequent decision based on this assessment.
  3. Also, we have identified an issue with the form used by the medical assessor which only requires them to tick a box to justify their decision. It does not prompt them to include their reasoning for making that decision. We have therefore invited the Council to review this form to ensure that medical assessors are prompted to include their justification for the decisions they make.

Back to top

Agreed Action

  1. To its credit, the Council agreed to resolve the complaint and will complete the above within one month of the final decision.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We have upheld this complaint because the Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings