London Borough of Southwark (24 012 926)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 08 Jan 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of Mr X’s housing application. This is because we are unlikely to find fault by the Council sufficient to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council has failed to take proper account of his mental and physical illnesses in determining his housing band priority and he wants to move as soon as possible to another property.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’ which we call ‘fault’. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)
  2. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant, including the Council’s response to his complaint
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. It is not our role to act as a point of appeal against decisions made by councils with which complainants do not agree. We cannot question council decisions if they have followed the right steps and considered the relevant evidence and information.
  2. The Council has assessed and reviewed Mr X’s housing application and placed him in Band 3. While Mr X may be disappointed with this decision, there is no evidence to suggest fault affected it. Mr X has a number of health conditions but the Council decided he does not have a medical requirement to move. This is a decision the Council is entitled to make, and we cannot review its merits.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we are unlikely to find fault by the Council sufficient to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings