London Borough of Camden (24 011 880)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 02 Jan 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s assessment of a housing application. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the Council’s assessment of his housing application. He says he lives in a council property with three flights of stairs and believes his family’s medical needs should make them eligible for medical priority.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information provided by the complainant and the Council’s response. I have also considered the Council’s housing allocations policy.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says the Council has not given his housing application sufficient priority for him to bid successfully on a three-bedroomed property. He lives in a Council social-rented flat which has three flights of stairs. He says he and his wife have medical needs which makes the access to their home difficult and they are overcrowded.
  2. The Council carried out a medical assessment in 2023 and a further one in 2024 when Mr X submitted new evidence. It says that he does not meet the threshold for medical priority because he and his wife do not qualify for the mobility elements of Personal Independence payment from the Department for Work and Pensions and he is eligible to bid on properties with stairs because he is able to manage them. The Council has awarded 100 points for overcrowding in his home.
  3. I have seen no evidence of fault which would suggest that Mr X should be placed in a higher banding. The Council has made two assessments of medical needs and concluded that the health issues are not sufficiently affected by the family’s current housing conditions to meet the medical priority threshold.
  4. The Ombudsman may not find fault with a council’s assessment of a housing application/ a housing applicant’s priority if it has carried this out in line with its published allocations scheme. We recognise that the demand for social housing far outstrips the supply of properties in many areas.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s assessment of a housing application. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings