London Borough of Bexley (24 004 280)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Jul 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s refusal to accept her housing application on to its Housing Register. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate.  The complaint has been made late and there are no good reasons for us to investigate.

The complaint

  1. Mr Y complains, on behalf of Mrs X, about the Council’s failure to approve her application for housing on to its Housing Register to move closer to other family members who live in the London Borough of Bexley.  
  2. Mr Y says that Mrs X has a serious health condition and the Council has failed to take in to account properly. He says that, as Mrs X deteriorates, she would benefit from living in the Council’s area and being closer to other family members. 

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’ causing an injustice. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  3. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council rejected Mrs X’s application in 2022 saying she did not meet the 5-year residency requirement. It also said it had considered her case under its ‘exceptional case criteria’ but decided she did not meet its criteria for priority housing on health grounds.
  2. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint. It lies outside our jurisdiction because it is late. The law says a complaint should be made to us within 12 months of the person affected first becoming aware of the matter. Mrs X was aware of the matter at the relevant time, and I see no good reasons to exercise discretion to consider it now.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it lies outside our jurisdiction and there are no good reasons to consider it now.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings