Westminster City Council (22 016 227)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Mar 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of Miss X’s housing register application. She complains the Council has refused to move her to a bigger property. This is because the complaint is outside the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction as it is late and there are no good reasons for why Miss X could not have complained to us earlier.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains about the Council’s handling of her housing register application. She says she asked the Council to move her to a bigger property, but the Council refused to do so.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X asked the Council to move her to a larger property as she was overcrowded in her current property.
  2. The Council responded to Miss X’s complaint about the matter in March 2021. The Council explained it recognised Miss X needed a larger property and that her housing application was registered for a transfer to a 2 bedroom property. The Council also told Miss X of her position number on the transfer list.
  3. The Council also explained it could not rehouse Miss X out of turn as there were other households ahead of her on the transfer list. The Council said there was no evidence of any fault with its handling of Miss X’s housing application as she was registered for the correct size property for her household and the correct number of points had been allocated.
  4. The Council’s complaint response told Miss X how she could escalate her complaint. The Council told us Miss X did not ask for the complaint to be escalated to stage 2.
  5. Therefore, the complaint is late. This is because Miss X was aware of her concerns about the Council’s handling of her housing application and request for a move to a larger property in 2021. This is longer than 12 months ago.
  6. In addition, if Miss X was unhappy with the Council’s response to her complaint in March 2021, it is reasonable to have expected her to escalate her complaint to stage 2. It is likely had she done this, the Council would have signposted her to us in its final complaint response. Therefore, I do not consider there are any good reasons for why we should exercise discretion to consider the late complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because it is outside the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction. This is because the complaint is late and there are no good reasons for why she could not have complained to us earlier.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings