London Borough of Redbridge (21 007 824)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Nov 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the complainant’s banding on the housing register. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council and because it is a late complaint.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I refer to as Mrs X, complains about her banding on the housing register. She says she needs to be in a higher band due to disrepair in her home.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council. This includes email correspondence and the allocations policy. I also considered our Assessment Code and comments Mrs X made in reply to a draft of this decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The housing allocation policy says people must ask for a review within 21 days of a decision they think is wrong.
  2. In 2019 the Council placed Mrs X in band three on the housing register. In July 2021 Mrs X asked the Council to review her banding. In response, the Council explained it was too late to ask for a review as more than 21 days had passed since the Council had made the banding decision in 2019. The Council said Mrs X could ask for a reassessment and, if she was unhappy with the reassessment, she would then have 21 days to ask for a review. The Council says Mrs X has not asked for a reassessment.
  3. I will not start an investigation because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. The Council has correctly told Mrs X that it is too late to have a review but she can ask for a reassessment. Mrs X can ask for a reassessment and explain the problems she has with disrepair.
  4. I also will not start an investigation because this is a late complaint. Mrs X has known about the banding decision since 2019 but did not complain about it until 2021.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council and because it is a late complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings