Wychavon District Council (20 010 880)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Mar 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Miss X complained about the Council’s assessment of her housing application. We should not investigate this complaint. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained about the Council placing her in Band 3 on the housing waiting list when she believes that she should be in a higher banding. She wants the Council to increase her priority on the list.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered all the information which Miss X submitted with her complaint. I have also considered the Council’s response. Miss X has been given an opportunity to comment on a draft copy of my decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Miss X is a social housing tenant in a housing association property. She says the flat is too small for her family and that it suffers from dampness which the landlord is aware of but hasn’t yet resolved. Her priority is because she is short of one bedroom under the allocations scheme and her health problems and she is in Band 3.
  2. Miss X asked for a review of her banding and the Council did this in January 2021. The review did not change the banding because her circumstances did not warrant the next banding. The Council says the housing association landlord is seeking to repair the property to address the dampness.
  3. The Ombudsman may not find fault with a council’s assessment of a housing applicant’s priority if it has carried this out in line with its published allocations scheme. The review took Miss X’s circumstances into account but did not change her priority.
  4. If her social housing landlord fails to address the disrepair in her home, she could submit a complaint to the Housing Ombudsman service which is the proper authority to investigate complaints from social housing tenants.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We should not investigate this complaint. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings