Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 52298 results

  • Hertfordshire County Council (23 019 105)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 24-Feb-2025

    Summary: The Council was at fault for failing to deliver Ms X’s son’s special educational needs support, and for failing to review his direct payments when Ms X asked it to. It has already arranged the support and, without our involvement, offered some suitable remedies for the injustice Ms X and her son suffered. It has now also agreed to make an additional symbolic payment to Ms X to recognise the injustice which may have been caused from its failure to review her son’s direct payments.

  • King's Lynn & West Norfolk Council (24 000 985)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 23-Feb-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal to replace a fence which it says is not its responsibility. We cannot determine the ownership of property boundaries. Only the courts can decide such matters.

  • Transport for London (24 015 912)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 23-Feb-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Authority ending a bus journey early without providing a refund or a free replacement ticket to extend the journey. We cannot determine claims about breaches of contractual conditions. Only the courts can do this.

  • Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Council (24 015 842)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 22-Feb-2025

    Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint that the Council was at fault in the course of amending the complainant’s child’s Education Health and Care plan and in responding to her subsequent complaint. This is because the complainant has used her right to appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability).

  • Slough Borough Council (24 016 127)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax 22-Feb-2025

    Summary: We will not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint about council tax arrears recovery. This complaint was received outside the normal 12-month period for investigating complaints. There is no evidence to suggest that Miss X could not have complained to us sooner.

  • Dorset Council (24 016 138)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 22-Feb-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s assessment of a housing application. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

  • Cheshire East Council (24 016 404)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Disabled children 22-Feb-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the actions of a Council officer in carrying out an assessment of the complainant’s son’s needs. This is because investigation would achieve nothing significant.

  • Kent County Council (24 016 626)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 22-Feb-2025

    Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint that the Council was at fault during the process of the complainant’s appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability). By law, we cannot consider a council’s actions during an appeal.

  • London Borough of Lewisham (24 000 721)

    Statement Not upheld Other 21-Feb-2025

    Summary: Mr K complains the Council failed to respond properly to his complaints about a street refuse collection point. He says this caused pests and fly tipping. There is no fault by the Council.

  • Coventry City Council (24 004 090)

    Statement Upheld Other 21-Feb-2025

    Summary: Ms X complained about failings by the Council’s Adult Social Care service to support both her and her adult son, Mr Y. We found the Council at fault for failing to follow-up on respite care, and for failing to properly consider what support it could offer when Mr Y’s behaviour escalated. The Council agreed to provide a symbolic financial remedy for the distress this caused. The Council was also at fault over the advice it gave on emergency accommodation, but this did not cause significant injustice.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings