South Kesteven District Council (25 001 051)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Sep 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a possible breach of planning control. This is because we are unlikely to find fault.

The complaint

  1. Ms X has complained about how the Council dealt with a possible breach of planning control.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X contacted the Council as she was concerned about a local business placing an advertising sign on a footpath. Ms X says the sign blocks the path causing potential safety issues and the Council has failed to take any action to resolve the problem.
  2. However, I am satisfied the Council properly considered Ms X’s concerns about the sign. It agreed the sign was displayed without advertising consent. It spoke to the business owner and arranged for the sign to be moved before closing its enforcement case and deciding further enforcement action was not necessary.
  3. I understand Ms X may disagree with the Council’s decision to close its enforcement case. But it was entitled to use its professional judgment to decide formal action was not necessary. As the Council properly considered if it should take enforcement action, it is unlikely I would find fault.
  4. Ms X says the business blocks the highway causing a hazard. But Ms X should contact the local highway authority if she is concerned about the highway being blocked.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because we are unlikely to find fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings