Plymouth City Council (26 012 964)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trees

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 Aug 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s actions relating to an insurance claim. This is because there would be no worthwhile outcome by us investigating. This is because we cannot achieve what the complainant wants and only a court can decide if the Council is liable to pay for damages to a house. It would be reasonable to expect Miss X to use her court remedy in this instance.

The complaint

  1. Miss X is unhappy, because the Council did not take action much sooner, relating to her concerns about large trees near her home. She says her home has now been damaged by the trees, and she cannot get the Council to respond to a claim from her insurance company.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  3. Negligence claims and interpreting the law around civil liability are generally best decided by a court where the Council does not accept insurance liability. Only a court can decide whether the problem should have been dealt with by the Council before it caused damage to a person’s property, or if it is liable to pay damages for a person’s loss.  

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because we cannot direct the Council to accept liability for damages where it denies an insurance claim, only the courts can do this. It would be reasonable to expect Miss X to pursue court action, through her insurers if necessary.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings