What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council (26 010 793)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trees

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about delays in the Council considering Mr X’s planning application. It would be reasonable to expect Mr X to use his right of appeal to the Planning Inspector.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about delays in the Council considering his planning application. Mr X applied for permission to carry out works on a protected tree.
  2. Mr X said the matter caused distress and the tree poses a risk to neighbouring properties.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)
  3. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about:
  • Delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission
  • A decision to refuse planning permission
  • Conditions placed on planning permission
  • A planning enforcement notice.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X said he submitted a planning application in September 2025 to seek permission to carry out works on a protected tree.
  2. Mr X complained to the Ombudsman in July 2026 and said the Council had not responded to his application.
  3. Mr X has a right of appeal to the Planning Inspector here, because the Council have taken longer than eight weeks to decide on his application. As outlined in paragraph seven, we cannot usually investigate where a person has a right of appeal to a government minister.
  4. It would be reasonable to expect Mr X to use this right because it is set out in law and the Planning Inspector has powers to decide the application.
  5. For this reason, we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it would be reasonable to expect him to use his right of appeal to the Planning Inspector.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings