Birmingham City Council (26 009 471)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trees

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Aug 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to a request for works to a highway tree. There is insufficient evidence of fault on the Council’s part to warrant investigation.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains that the Council has failed to respond reasonably to his request that it remove branches from a highway tree.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X’s complaint concerns the Council’s management of a highway tree close to his property. He says a branch fell from the tree onto his driveway and he is concerned that larger overhanging branches may also do so, potentially causing damage. He has asked the Council to remove the branches. He complains that it has declined to do so and has not responded to his concerns appropriately.
  2. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. It is not for us to take a view on whether the requested work is appropriate. That is a matter for the professional judgement of the Council. The question for the Ombudsman is whether there is evidence of fault in the way the Council made its decision not to carry out the work.
  3. The correspondence Mr X has provided shows that the Council’s contractors have inspected the tree and identified no grounds to justify works outside the Council’s maintenance schedule. There is no evidence that the Council was at fault in how it reached its decision not to prune the tree. That being the case, we cannot intervene to criticise the decision or substitute an alternative view.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault on the Council’s part.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings