London Borough of Islington (25 020 587)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trees

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 May 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about maintenance of a tree near her home. The Council has told Ms X it is not responsible for the tree, as it is not on Council-owned land. If Ms X disputes this, the courts are better placed to resolve this matter. If Ms X considers the Council liable for damage to her property, this is better considered by the Council’s insurers or the courts.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains the Council has failed to adequately maintain a tree it is responsible for on Council-owned land. She says the tree is causing damage to her property. She wants the Council to adequately maintain or remove the tree.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or
  • there is another body better placed to consider this complaint.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In its complaint response, the Council told Ms X the tree was not on Council-owned land, and so it was not responsible for managing the tree. We will not investigate this. We cannot resolve a dispute about land ownership, only a court can do this. If Ms X disputes the Council’s position, this matter is better considered by a court.
  2. We will also not investigate Ms X’s complaint that the Council is responsible for damage to her property caused by the tree. We cannot decide whether a Council is liable for any damage and whether it should pay Ms X compensation. This is better considered by the Council’s insurers and if necessary, the courts. If Ms X considers the tree has caused damage to her property and the Council is liable, it is open to her to submit a claim to the Council’s insurers. If she is dissatisfied with the outcome, it is reasonable for her to take the matter to court.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because the courts are better placed to resolve a dispute about land ownership and if Ms X considers the Council liable for damage to her property, she can claim through the Council’s insurers and if dissatisfied with the outcome, take the matter to court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings