Suffolk County Council (23 005 946)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trees

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 23 Aug 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal to carry out works to highway trees. This is because there is no evidence of fault on the Council’s part.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Mrs X, complains that the Council has unreasonably refused her request for the pollarding of highway trees.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X’s complaint relates to two highway trees close to her home. She says the trees are too tall and interfere with utility cables. She says leaf and branch fall causes nuisance and risk to people and property.
  2. Mrs X has made repeated requests to the Council to carry out pollarding work to address the problems caused by the trees. The Council has refused. It holds that the work is unnecessary. It is against this decision that Mrs X complains.
  3. The Ombudsman will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is no evidence of fault on the Council’s part. Mrs X and the Council disagree on whether the trees require work. It is not for us to take a view. Rather, it is to consider whether there is evidence of fault in the way the Council made its decision. There is no such evidence.
  4. The Council has inspected the trees and clearly set out its findings in the context of the relevant policies. Its conclusion that works are not required is a matter for the professional judgement of the officers concerned. Without evidence of fault in the way the decision was made the Ombudsman cannot intervene to criticise it, or to substitute an alternative view.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is no evidence of fault on the Council’s part.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings