London Borough of Hillingdon (21 015 117)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trees

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Feb 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s management of its trees in Ms X’s road. This is because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to as Ms X, complains about the management of Council trees which run along her road. She says they have not been properly maintained, are too near the houses and have caused drainage problems.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’ which we call ‘fault’. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)
  2. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X, including the Council’s responses to her complaint.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X complained to the Council about its management of its trees which she said were causing problems to residents in her road. The Council told Ms X that the trees were in good condition, had been inspected recently and that it had no plans to remove the trees. It confirmed it would reinspect the trees in a year’s time.
  2. In response to Ms X’s concerns about drainage in the road, the Council confirmed its contractors had carried out work which it expected to reduce flooding during heavy downpours and that it had reported the presence of roots it had found in pipes to Thames Water so that body could take appropriate action.
  3. In response to Ms X’s concerns about parking in her road, the Council explained if people had parked illegally she could contact the Council to see if Civil Enforcement Officers could attend and that if she and other residents wanted parking restrictions and permits introduced, they could follow the petition process and submit a petition requesting consideration of this.
  4. We do not investigate every complaint we receive. We are publicly funded and have an obligation to use the funds allocated to us in an effective, efficient and economic manner. While I understand Ms X may not be satisfied with the Council’s response to her concerns, we will not investigate the complaint because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault sufficient to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings