Hampshire County Council (21 007 581)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trees

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Sep 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint that the Council damaged his garage by planting trees close to the boundary of his property. This is because it is reasonable for Mr B to pursue his claim against the Council by taking the Council to court.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Mr B, complains that his garage has been damaged by trees which were planted by the Council. Mr B complains the Council has refused to accept liability for the damage to his garage despite evidence he has provided including a geology report. Mr B says his garage needs to be demolished and re-built because of the extent of the damage. Mr B would like the Council to settle his claim or for the Ombudsman to mediate between him and the Council.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. We refer to this as ‘fault’.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr B and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council’s insurers considered Mr B’s claim for compensation but did not accept the Council is liable for the damage to his garage. Mr B may pursue his claim by taking the Council to court.
  2. The role of the Ombudsman is to consider complaints of administrative fault. We cannot decide liability in complaints about damage to property. This is for the Council’s insurers and ultimately for the courts. Only the court can decide if the Council has been negligent.
  3. The court can assess what damages, if any, the Council should pay. Also, unlike the Ombudsman, the court can order a party to pay damages.
  4. I find it is reasonable for Mr B to take the Council to court. The fees for making a claim are relatively modest and Mr B may ask for the fee to be reimbursed if his claim is successful.
  5. Also, it is not the role of the Ombudsman to provide mediation, which Mr B has requested.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint because it is reasonable for him to take the Council to court.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings