London Borough of Bromley (21 006 673)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trees

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Sep 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council will not pay the complainant the full cost of replacing his garden wall. This is because we cannot decide what the Council should pay towards the repairs. Where the amount is disputed, the matter is for the courts to decide. It is therefore reasonable to expect the complainant to go to court to resolve the matter.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will call Mr X, complains the Council will not pay the full amount quoted to replace his garden wall. The damage was caused by a Council owned tree. Mr X would like the Council to pay the full amount for the replacement of the wall, in line with his quotes.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered all information provided by Mr X, this includes the Council response. I also considered our Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council in April 2020 that the Council owned tree outside his property had damaged his garden wall and the wall needs replacing.
  2. The Council has admitted liability for the damage to the wall and asked Mr X to obtain two quotes for the damage to be rectified. Mr X obtained two quotes, which both quoted for replacement of the wall, one for £4,140 and the other for £3,860.
  3. The Council has offered Mr X a final settlement figure of £2,500 for the work to be carried out. They Council explained they offer settlement on an indemnity basis and not a new for old basis.
  4. Mr X is unhappy with the offer and states the Council were aware of the impact the tree was having on his wall in 2010, when he contacted them. He would like the Council to remove the tree and pay the full cost of replacing the wall.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I will not investigate this complaint because it is reasonable for Mr X to take the matter to court to dispute the settlement amount.
  2. There is a simple procedure in the county court for dealing with small claims. Usually, solicitors are not required so the only costs will be the court fees.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings