Bedford Borough Council (25 019 199)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trading standards

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint alleging fraud by a person linked to a council employee. This is because we are unlikely to be able to add to the Council’s responses.

The complaint

  1. Mr X alleges the Council has failed to investigate fraud and deception by an individual linked to a Council employee.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

  1. We cannot investigate a complaint if it is about a personnel issue. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5a, paragraph 4, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I have seen information showing the Council responded to Mr X’s concerns on several occasions explaining that his allegations have been passed to the appropriate departments for consideration. And that it would not be providing any information to avoid breaching the personal data of the Council employee in question.
  2. In particular, the Council confirms that the trading standards complaint has been referred to the trading standards department local to where the business activity is located in a different council area. And the allegations about benefits fraud are for another council and also the department for works and pensions.
  3. We will not investigate. The Council has responded appropriately to Mr X’s concerns and made referrals to the relevant authorities. As outlined in paragraph three, we have no remit to look at the Council’s role as an employer regarding its investigation of its employee. Further, it has explained the reasons it cannot provide updates. In these circumstances we are unlikely to add to the Council’s investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we could not add to the Council’s investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings