Lancashire County Council (22 014 673)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trading standards

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Feb 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s Trading Standards team’s decision not to take formal action against a local business. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault affecting its decision. The decision also does not cause Mr X significant injustice and it is unlikely investigation would achieve any worthwhile outcome for him.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains the Council’s Trading Standards team failed to take appropriate action against a local business for refusing to provide a service offered in its promotional material.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We are not an appeal body. This means we do not take a second look at a decision to decide if it was wrong. Instead, we look at the processes an organisation followed to make its decision. If we consider it followed those processes correctly we cannot question whether the decision was right or wrong.
  2. The Council has addressed Mr X’s concerns about its decision and there is not enough evidence of fault in the way it was reached to warrant further investigation. In addition, the Council’s decision does not cause Mr X significant injustice. The injustice he claims stems from the business’s refusal to provide the service he wanted but the Council could not force it to. Investigation is therefore unlikely to achieve any worthwhile outcome for Mr X.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council causing Mr X significant injustice. It is also unlikely we could achieve anything for Mr X by investigating further.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings