Nottinghamshire County Council (19 003 420)
Category : Environment and regulation > Trading standards
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 11 Jul 2019
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: The Ombudsman cannot investigate this complaint about the execution of a search warrant by the Council at the complainant’s home. This is because the matter is connected to court proceedings.
The complaint
- Mr X says the Council executed a search warrant on his property for a business that has nothing to do with him. He says the business relates to a previous tenant who moved out 5 years ago. Mr X believes the Council should not have done this and should have been aware the business it had a search warrant for no longer trades at his address.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
- We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I considered the information provided by Mr X. He comment on the draft version of this decision.
What I found
- The Council says it has information that evidence connected to a current trading standards investigation may be stored at Mr X’s address.
- It says it presented the evidence to the magistrates’ court when it requested a search warrant. The court granted the Council a warrant to enter and search Mr X’s home. This was then executed in the presence of police officers.
Final decision
- I cannot investigate this complaint. This is because the information used by the Council to get the search warrant was considered by the magistrates’ court as part of criminal proceedings before a court of law. Therefore, the restriction I describe in paragraph 3 applies and we have no jurisdiction to investigate this complaint.
Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman