Cheshire East Council (25 024 569)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 15 Jun 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council charged him to replace a wheelie bin he said it damaged during a collection because the claimed injustice is not significant enough to warrant our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council:
      1. damaged his bin during a collection and charged him for a replacement; and
      2. failed to process his complaint in line with its complaints policy.
  2. Mr X said the matter caused him frustration and time and trouble.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

Charge for replacement bin

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council damaged his bin and charged him for a replacement.
  2. Our role is to consider complaints where the person bringing the complaint has suffered significant personal injustice as a direct result of the actions or inactions of the organisation. This means we will normally only investigate a complaint where the complainant has suffered serious loss, harm, or distress as a direct result of faults or failures.
  3. The cost of a replacement bin is less than £40. Mr X has not been caused a significant enough injustice to warrant an investigation by the Ombudsman.

Complaints handling

  1. It is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures if we decide not to investigate the substantive issue. Consequently, we will not investigate this complaint because the tests in our Assessment Code are not met.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the tests in our Assessment Code are not met.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings