What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Cheshire East Council (25 023 836)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council refusing to pay for a replacement refuse bin. The level of injustice caused to the complainant by the alleged fault is not significant enough to warrant our continued involvement in the matter.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council should pay for a replacement refuse bin after his was damaged during extremely windy conditions, as the crew left the bin out on an exposed pavement instead of returning it to the more sheltered collection point.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. So, we do not start an investigation if we decide:
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council, as well as the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Our role is to consider complaints where the person bringing the complaint has suffered significant personal injustice as a direct result of the actions or inactions of the organisation. This means we will normally only investigate a complaint where the complainant has suffered serious loss, harm, or distress as a direct result of faults or failures. We will not normally investigate a complaint where the alleged loss or injustice is not a serious or significant matter.
  2. The cost of a replacement bin in this case is £36. This is a relatively modest amount and does not justify public money being spent on an investigation by the Ombudsman. Therefore, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the level of injustice caused by the alleged fault is not significant enough to warrant our continued involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings