What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Swindon Borough Council (25 022 948)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 25 Jun 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about missed recycling collections because any injustice is not significant enough to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains the Council has missed several recycling collections. She says she had to put the uncollected recycling into the general waste collection.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X complained the Council missed five recycling bin collections. The Council said it told the collection crew about the issue. It said it would only collect waste from a bin and not from the floor next to a bin for efficiency and safety.
  2. The Council says that it has only missed one collection in the five months since Miss X complained.
  3. We will normally only investigate a complaint where the complainant has suffered serious loss, harm, or distress as a direct result of faults or failures. We will not normally investigate a complaint where the alleged loss or injustice is not a serious or significant matter. While I recognise the inconvenience caused to Miss X, I consider any injustice is not significant enough to justify an investigation by the Ombudsman.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because any injustice is not significant enough to justify an investigation by the Ombudsman.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings