Thurrock Council (25 016 590)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 May 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the location of bins near her property. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to warrant out involvement.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complained the Council did not move nine bin containers inside an enclosed bin store as agreed. She said the smell is unbearable. She wants the Council to move the bins into the storage area.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X said the Council did not move bin containers into enclosed storage as it agreed in response to her request.
  2. In its complaint response the Council explained the bin shed had a fire meaning it was unsafe to use. It said the shed was not cost effective to repair. Although Ms X disagrees with the Council’s decision not to repair the shed, there is not enough evidence of fault to warrant our involvement.
  3. In addition, our role is to consider complaints where the person bringing the complaint has suffered significant personal injustice as a direct result of the actions or inactions of the organisation. This means we will normally only investigate a complaint where the complainant has suffered serious loss, harm, or distress as a direct result of faults or failures. We will not normally investigate a complaint where the alleged loss or injustice is not a serious or significant matter.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to warrant our involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings