Lincoln City Council (25 010 401)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 16 Dec 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Mr X’s bin collections because it would not add anything to the investigation and outcome provided by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council provided wrong information which meant he was putting out the wrong bin each week, and it was not being emptied by the Council.
  2. Mr X says the Council’s misinformation and resulting missed bins has had a significant impact on his mental health and is seeking a financial remedy for this. He also says the Council has not addressed all his contact with them.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council as his bins were not being collected as he expected. He had used the Council’s online calendar to ensure he presented the correct bins each week.
  2. The Council visited his property a month later and saw the bins Mr X had presented were not correct. On looking into this, the Council accepted its online calendar and staff had given wrong information to Mr X.
  3. The Council corrected its online calendar and told Mr X which bins were due and when.
  4. The Council explained that it does not have any other records of his contact but acknowledged and apologised for its errors.
  5. Although the Council accept it has caused a significant impact on Mr X, it did not offer a financial remedy.
  6. As the issues have been acknowledged, corrected and apologised for, any further investigation is unlikely to add anything to what the Council has already provided.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we could not add to the investigation by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings