Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council (25 008 027)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Feb 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about missed bin collections. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s actions, so further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Mr Y complained the Council missed two bin collections, refused to offer him a partial refund and did not handle his complaint properly.
  2. Mr Y said this caused him distress and a loss of faith in the Council.
  3. Mr Y wants the Council to apologise, review its processes so all missed bin collections trigger a partial refund, and to offer him a partial refund for the two missed bin collections.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr Y and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr Y complained to the Council after it missed two bin collections.
  2. The Council apologised to Mr Y for the two missed bin collections and accepted that it did not handle his complaint in line with its two-stage complaints procedure.
  3. The Council also said its policy stated that a partial refund would apply if there were three missed bin collections. As there had been two missed bin collections, a partial refund would not apply in Mr Y’s case.
  4. We will not investigate this complaint. As the Council accepted fault, apologised and considered the request for a partial refund in line with its policy, there is not enough evidence of fault to warrant us investigating. Further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.
  5. It is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures, if we decide not to deal with the substantive issue.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr Y’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s actions, so further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings