Gravesham Borough Council (25 005 040)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council charging the complainant for bins. This is mainly because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

The complaint

  1. Miss X says the Council should not be charging her £90 for replacement bins because it did not previously supply bins to her property. She says the Council told her to falsely report her bins as stolen if she wanted to get free bins.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Environmental Protection Act 1990 says the Council can charge for providing bins. The Council charges for replacement bins, except in certain circumstances.
  2. Miss X is unhappy about paying £90 for replacement bins. She says a property she bought and rented out had no bins when she bought it, so the Council should provide free new bins.
  3. I recognise that Miss X is unhappy about paying for her bins. However, there is insufficient evidence of fault to justify further investigation. The Council can charge for providing the bins. It has considered Miss X’s circumstances under its policy and decided that she does not qualify for free bins. It has information showing there were previously bins at the property. It has followed the law and its own policy.
  4. Miss X says the Council told her to falsely tell the police her bins were stolen. There is insufficient evidence of fault to justify further investigation of this. The Council was explaining to Miss X how it operated its replacement bins policy. There is nothing to show that the Council told Miss X to report theft if she did not believe any theft had happened.
  5. The two replacement bins cost £90. In the context of a landlord renting out a property, that is not a significant enough amount to warrant the Ombudsman investigating. This is another reason we will not investigate the complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint. There is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. There is also not enough injustice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings