Kingston Upon Hull City Council (24 019 335)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Not upheld

Decision date : 30 Jul 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complained about the position the Council places his bin after it is emptied. We decided to end our investigation as further investigation would not lead to a different outcome than the Council already provided and there is insufficient significant personal injustice to warrant further investigation. 

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council sometimes leaves his recycling bin in front of his garage. This means in order to access the back path behind his house he has to open his garage door against the empty bins.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. It is our decision whether to start, and when to end an investigation into something the law allows us to investigate. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
    • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
    • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation; or
    • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome; or
    • there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered evidence provided by Mr X and the Council as well as relevant law, policy and guidance.
  2. Mr X and the Council had an opportunity to comment on my draft decision. I considered any comments before making a final decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr X’s bins are collected by the Council at the back of his property along a path. Mr X has a garage which runs the width of his back garden and the garage door opens out onto the back path.
  2. For several years Mr X has raised concerns about the Council placing his bins in front of his garage door. This means to access the pathway at the back of his property he has to open his garage door against the bin or walk around the block to access the back path.
  3. In the past the Council has placed stickers on his bins to tell bin crews not to place the bins in front of his garage. Mr X has also placed signage and painted a yellow area on the floor in front of the garage to discourage bin crews from leaving his bins there.
  4. Mr X said the issue is with his recycling bin which is collected every fortnight. He said after some measures were taken such as the stickers things did improve for a while.
  5. In late 2024, Mr X complained to the Council about this. Mr X told the Council it was his recycling bin which was being left in front of his garage door. The Council responded to Mr X in January 2025. The Council upheld his complaint and said it would send a memo to its bin crews to tell them to place his bin in the correct place. The Council also said its monitoring team would carry out checks to make sure this happened.
  6. Mr X said since the end of the complaints process there have been a few times when bin crews have placed his recycling bin in front of his garage. Mr X said he has not told the Council about this.

Analysis

  1. The Council has recognised it was at fault for placing Mr X’s recycling bin in front of his garage. It has taken action to prevent this from happening in the future by telling the bin crews to put the bin in a designated place. This is the kind of outcome we would expect to achieve from this kind of complaint. Further investigation would unlikely achieve a different outcome for Mr X so we will not investigate further.
  2. I am also not satisfied the injustice caused from the fault by the Council is sufficient enough to warrant further investigation. I recognise the bin being placed in front of Mr X’s garage would cause annoyance, however the bin is empty and Mr X also has the option of walking around the row of houses to access the path behind his property.

Back to top

Decision

  1. I have ended my investigation into Mr X’s complaint because:
    • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome than that already provided; and
    • the matters complained of cause insufficient significant personal injustice to warrant us investigating; 

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings