Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (24 013 124)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Dec 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint that the Council’s waste collection service damaged her bin. This is because an investigation is unlikely to achieve any worthwhile outcome, and Mrs X’s claimed injustice is not significant enough to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained the Council’s household waste service damaged her bin during a collection. Mrs X also said the Council failed to respond to her complaint.
  2. Mrs X says the matter caused her frustration.
  3. Mrs X wants the Council to repair or replace her waste bin.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint that the Council damaged her bin. Mrs X said the Council told her its crew did not report any damage during the collection. Mrs X disputes this and says she and her partner witnessed the damage.
  2. An investigation by the Ombudsman is unlikely to be able to establish, even on a balance of probabilities, that the Council damaged Mrs X’s bin. Therefore, there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by an investigation, and so we will not investigate.
  3. In addition, Mrs X’s claimed injustice is not significant enough to warrant an investigation. The cost of a replacement bin is £45, with possible concessions for those on certain benefits. Therefore, any alleged injustice is not significant enough to warrant an investigation, and we will not investigate this complaint.
  4. Mrs X also complained the Council did not respond to her complaint. It is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures, if we are unable to deal with the substantive issue. Therefore, we will not investigate this matter further.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because an investigation is unlikely to achieve any worthwhile outcome, and Mrs X’s claimed injustice is not significant enough to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings