Wokingham Borough Council (24 011 759)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 Dec 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council decided to introduce wheeled bins and alternate weekly collections. He also complains the Council refused to meet him to discuss the matter. We cannot investigate matters which affect all or most people in a Council’s area. And we do not consider the Council to be at fault in refusing to meet the complainant.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains councillors were misled when they decided to move to wheeled bins and alternate weekly collections. He also says the Council refused to agree to meet him to discuss the matter.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate something that affects all or most of the people in a council’s area. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(7), as amended)
  3. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X including the Council’s responses to his complaint.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council carried out a consultation in 2023 and decided to move to fortnightly refuse collections with wheeled bins in 2024. Mr X complained to the Council about the surveys and method to support introducing wheeled bins. He said the report to councillors was misleading.
  2. In response the Council confirmed it :
    • carried out a public consultation; and
    • assessed and mapped areas that were inappropriate for wheeled bins. Certain properties were visited to assess the suitability and residents contacted.
  3. These actions were carried out before the Council introduced the wheeled bins and alternate collections.
  4. The law says we cannot investigate any issue that affects all or most of the residents of a council area. The decision to introduce wheeled bins and alternate collections is a decision which affects the whole borough and not just Mr X. Therefore we cannot start an investigation.
  5. Mr X also complains the Council refused his request for a meeting with the Chief Executive. The Council is not required to agree to such a meeting; therefore we cannot consider the refusal to be a fault.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. We cannot consider complaints about decision which affect all or most of the residents of the Council’s area, and we do not consider there is evidence of fault in the Council’s decision to refuse a meeting with Mr X.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings