Northumberland County Council (23 009 373)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 25 Oct 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s collection of Mr X’s refuse. This is because the Council has done enough to put right any injustice its fault caused and we could not achieve anything more.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council has changed waste collection arrangements without explaining why. Mr X also complains about the way the Council has dealt with his altercation with a refuse collector. Mr X wants the Council to move the waste collector to another round.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

  1. If we are satisfied with an organisation’s actions or proposed actions, we can complete our investigation and issue a decision statement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 30(1B) and 34H(i), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X had a long-standing arrangement with the Council for his bins to be collected and returned to his drive. The Council stopped returning his bins in this way without telling him there would be a change.
  2. When Mr X complained to the Council, it explained that an overgrown shrub meant the wagon could not safely reverse on to the drive. It apologised for not explaining this sooner and sent a letter with details. The law says the Council may set the arrangements for presenting household waste for collection, so it is not at fault for making changes.
  3. Mr X then complained there had been an altercation with a waste collector and asked the Council to move this person to a different round.
  4. The Council apologised and explained the CCTV footage showed Mr X played his part in the incident. The Council has apologised for the behaviour Mr X complained of but has said it will not change the person’s round.
  5. The Council has addressed the situation in line with its policies, apologised and provided an explanation to Mr X. It does not have to take the steps Mr X wants. The Ombudsman could not recommend the Council to move the waste collector as the deployment of staff is a matter for the Council.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we could not add to the Council’s investigation and response.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings