Leeds City Council (22 008 186)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Oct 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a missed bin collection and the way the Council responded. This is because there is insufficient evidence of injustice.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I refer to as Mrs X, complains about a missed bin collection. She also complains the Council breached her privacy by talking about her to her neighbours. Mrs X wants compensation.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide:
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council. This includes the complaint correspondence. I also considered our Assessment Code and comments Mrs X made in reply to a draft of this decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X reported a missed bin collection on 8 August. The Council returned and emptied the bin on 10 August. The Council explained the crews had difficulty accessing Mrs X's road due to a broken down van. As part of the complaint response the Council said it had spoken to neighbours who said Mrs X had not presented her bin for collection.
  2. Mrs X complains about the missed collection and inaccurate information in the responses. She is unhappy the Council spoke to her neighbours and says the officer could have spoken to her as she was home. She says she did not present her bin later in the month as there was no need, and she thinks there are bigger issues than the access problems.
  3. Missed collections are frustrating and inconvenient but the impact of one missed collection, which was rectified, does not represent sufficient injustice to require an investigation. And, while I appreciate Ms X is unhappy the Council spoke to her neighbours this, again, is not sufficient injustice to require an investigation. Further, Mrs X says she will contact the Information Commissioner which is the appropriate body to consider complaints about data protection.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of injustice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings