City of York Council (22 006 033)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Aug 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council missing some of her bin collections. The matters complained of did not cause Mrs X such a significant personal injustice to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council has failed to empty her bin on the correct collection day. She says the matter has caused her inconvenience, and mentions health issues from rubbish attracting vermin to her house. Mrs X wants the Council to collect her waste, and tell her what they are going to put in place to make sure it is collected.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information from Mrs X, and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council has not collected Mrs X’s bin on the correct weekday about two times since March 2022. We recognise crews not emptying bins on the usual day causes frustration and inconvenience from having to report the error and try to have them collected later. Mrs X also refers to uncollected waste attracting vermin, but she does not say this has happened at her house. The reported number of missed or delayed collections have not caused Mrs X such a significant personal injustice to justify us investigating.
  2. After Mrs X’s first formal Council complaint, officers did not respond substantively to her further emails on the matter. The Council also gave Mrs X two responses to her second formal complaint. One reply referred her to the Ombudsman, but a further letter sent the next day indicated the officer had forwarded her complaint to a different Council team who would give another response. It appears the Council may itself contact Mrs X again on this matter. But in any event, we do not investigate councils’ internal complaint-handling processes in isolation where we are not investigating the core issue which gave rise to the complaint. It is not a good use of our resources to do so. This limitation applies here so we will not investigate this issue.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because:
    • the matters complained of have not caused her such significant personal injustice to warrant us investigating;
    • we do not investigate councils’ complaints processes in isolation where we are not investigating the core issues which gave rise to the complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings