Bristol City Council (22 003 258)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Not upheld

Decision date : 23 Aug 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mrs D says the Council has failed to address refuse bins and fly tipping obstructing a pavement. The Ombudsman has discontinued the investigation because he cannot add to what the Council has already done, and further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. The complainant (whom I refer to as Mrs D) says the Council has failed to resolve problems with refuse bins left on the pavement and fly tipped items blocking the path she uses to walk her child to school.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have carefully considered all the information provided by Mrs D.
  2. I shared my draft decision with both parties and considered their responses.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mrs D has complained to the Council about residential refuse bins blocking a pavement she walks to take her child to school. She said large items are fly tipped and there is rubbish on the pavement. The Council considered her complaint and replied setting out its role and responsibilities. It also explained the actions it had taken as a result of her contact and undertook to visit the area again.
  2. I appreciate Mrs D remains dissatisfied with the Council. However, the Ombudsman must consider whether it is appropriate to investigate. In this case I do not see that we can add to the substantial information already provided by the Council or that we would find fault based on what I have seen to date. In addition, we cannot tell the Council to take formal enforcement action against residents and so cannot achieve the main outcome sought by Mrs D.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I have discontinued the investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings