Birmingham City Council (21 015 105)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Feb 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a missed garden waste collection. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault and injustice.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I refer to as Mr X, complains about a missed garden waste collection and about the way the Council responded to his complaint.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council. This includes Mr X’s emails to the Council and the complaint replies. I considered our Assessment Code and invited Mr X to comment on a draft of this decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X reported a missed garden waste collection on 30 November. He also complains the Council failed to register his report and did not deal with his complaint correctly.
  2. The Council apologised for the missed collection and said the crew returned a few days later but the bin was not available. Mr X denies the crew returned. The Council explained it responded to his complaints within the correct timescales.
  3. I will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault and injustice. I appreciate missed collections are annoying and inconvenient but the impact of one missed collection does not warrant an investigation. Mr X pays for the service but the monetary loss for one missed collection is small.
  4. In addition, while Mr X is dissatisfied with the way the Council responded, there is nothing to suggest we need to start an investigation. Mr X logged the missed collection on 30 November and by 12 December the Council had issued its final complaint response. There is not enough fault or injustice to require an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault and injustice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings