London Borough of Enfield (20 008 699)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 23 Feb 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complains about delay by the Council in providing him with a larger waste bin. Mr X says he was put to time and trouble pursuing this with the Council. We will not investigate as the injustice caused to Mr X is not at a level that would warrant our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about delay by the Council in providing him with a larger waste bin. Mr X says he was put to time and trouble pursuing this with the Council.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe the injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered what Mr X said in his complaint and the comments he made in response to my draft decision on it.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr X requested a larger waste bin from the Council in February 2020 as the Council was moving to fortnightly collections. Mr X says it was not until mid-June, after he had complained, that the bin was delivered.
  2. Mr X seeks an apology from the Council and a monetary payment to recognise the time and trouble he was put to. Mr X says after making his initial request, he made a further request via the internet and another by telephone. Mr X also referred the matter to his local councillor and when he still had not received his bin, Mr X made a formal complaint in June 2020. Mr X complains the Council failed to provide timely responses to his complaint.

Analysis

  1. Some time and trouble is to be expected when a problem arises and a complaint is made. We would only recommend a financial remedy where the time and trouble experienced was exceptional. Mr X was clearly put to some inconvenience but I do not consider he was impacted to a degree that would warrant either our further involvement in the complaint or a financial remedy payment.
  2. For this reason, we will not investigate Mr X’s complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. My decision is we will not investigate this complaint as the injustice caused to Mr X is not at a level that would warrant our involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings