Epping Forest District Council (25 015 597)

Category : Environment and regulation > Pollution

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s street cleaning services. This is because we are unlikely to add anything further to the Council’s response.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council upheld her complaint about cleaning her street but has not taken the actions it agreed. Mrs X says her street is filthy from a build up of rubbish and unkept weeds. She wants the Council to complete the agreed cleaning actions and have the weeds sprayed twice a year.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. If we are satisfied with an organisation’s actions or proposed actions, we can complete our investigation and issue a decision statement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 30(1B) and s34H(1), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council issued an apology to Mrs X and agreed to complete cleaning actions to her street. Mrs X complained the Council failed to complete the agreed actions.
  2. The Council has since confirmed it has completed the agreed cleaning actions. Street cleaning has been carried out, and the Council’s waste company will continue to monitor the situation.
  3. I am satisfied the Council remedied the injustice Mrs X suffered by issuing an apology and completing the agreed cleaning actions to her street. It is unlikely an investigation would add to the Council’s response or achieve anything more for Mrs X.
  4. Mrs X has also raised concerns about problems with maintenance of the highway and streetlights not working. However, it is the county council as local highway authority that would be responsible for these matters.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because we are unlikely to add anything further to the Council’s response.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings