Somerset Council (23 020 947)

Category : Environment and regulation > Pollution

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 06 May 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to the concerns Mr X raised about the safety of its 5G telecommunications roll out and possible health implications for him and the general public. This is because there is no evidence to suggest fault by the Council has caused him injustice.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council did not properly considered the information he sent to support concerns he raised about the safety of its 5G telecommunications roll out and possible health implications for him and the general public.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council, including its response to the complaint.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council about its response to the concerns he raised over its 5G roll out and his view of possible health implications relating to the installation of telecommunication masts.
  2. The Council responded to explain its position and responsibilities in this area and made clear that all matters relating to the 5G roll out are taken at a national level and based on factual evidence based scientific information. It referred Mr X to guidelines used from the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection and specialist advice from the UK Health Security Agency, giving him a link if he wanted to advise UKHSA of his concerns.
  3. While Mr X may not be satisfied with the Council’s response to his concerns, there is no evidence to suggest fault by the Council has caused him injustice.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is no evidence to suggest fault by the Council has caused him injustice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings