Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council (26 013 731)

Category : Environment and regulation > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 24 Aug 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s failure to address traffic issues on his street. The complaint is late and there are no good reasons for us to exercise discretion to consider it now. It would also be reasonable to expect Mr X to take the matter to court.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council failed to address traffic issues on his street. Mr X says the traffic is caused by local businesses, which the Council wishes to protect.
  2. Mr X says the Council has breached his human rights and caused him significant health issues.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  3. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained the Council failed to address traffic issues on his street and therefore breached his human rights.
  2. Mr X said the issues have been ongoing for years. The Council responded to his complaint in April 2024. Mr X complained to the Ombudsman in August 2026.
  3. As outlined in paragraph four, we cannot investigate late complaints without good reasons to do so. A late complaint is where a person has known about the issue for more than 12 months.
  4. I have seen no evidence to suggest Mr X could not have complained to us sooner. Therefore, there are no good reasons for us to exercise discretion to consider this complaint now and so we will not investigate.
  5. In any case, Mr X said the Council breached his human rights and seeks a finding that it has breached the Human Rights Act (HRA). This is not an outcome the Ombudsman can achieve. Only the courts can decide a council has breached the HRA.
  6. Mr X has sought advice from the Equality Advisory and Support Service (EASS) and told the Ombudsman he has gathered the funds to take the matter to court.
  7. For these reasons, I consider it would be reasonable for Mr X to take this matter to court.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is late and it would be reasonable for him to take the matter to court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings