What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council (25 024 490)

Category : Environment and regulation > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Jun 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council breaching her personal data. Further investigation by us would not lead to a different outcome and the Information Commissioner’s Office is better placed to consider it.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained the Council disclosed her personal data to an unauthorised third party.
  2. Mrs X said this caused significant distress.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome, or
  • there is another body better placed to consider this complaint.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

  1. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X complained the Council disclosed her personal data to an unauthorised third party, without her permission.
  2. In its complaint response, the Council acknowledged the error and upheld the complaint. It also apologised to Mrs X, identified improvements to its service and training needs for its staff, and offered a symbolic financial remedy which appears in line with our Guidance on Remedies.
  3. The actions taken by the Council appear appropriate. We would be unlikely to achieve significantly more than this by investigating. Therefore, we will not investigate this complaint.
  4. Also, because the complaint is about a breach of Mrs X’s personal data, the complaint is likely better placed with the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). Parliament set up the ICO to consider data protection disputes and issues and so it is better placed than the Ombudsman to consider these concerns.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because further investigation by us would not lead to a different outcome and the Information Commissioner’s Office would be better placed to consider it.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings