What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

London Borough of Waltham Forest (25 020 391)

Category : Environment and regulation > Other

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 23 Jun 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council issuing a fixed penalty notice to Ms X. This is because the Council has provided a suitable remedy to recognise the injustice caused by the delays.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains about a fixed penalty notice (FPN) she received for litter. She said she did not receive the initial letter about this and denies being responsible. Ms X said this has caused her significant distress. She wants the Council to return the money she paid for the fine, provide compensation and wants the Council to reform its system.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council issued Ms X a £300 FPN for leaving out a cardboard box. It sent two reminders and said it would seek a court summons if she did not pay. Ms X complained she had not received the Council’s letters. She said the communal bins were often overflowing, which may explain how rubbish fell out.
  2. In its final response, the Council said it had declined Ms X’s representations. It told her she could challenge the FPN in the magistrates’ court.
  3. If we investigate this complaint, it is likely we would find the Council at fault as it cannot provide any evidence to support how it properly considered the appropriate guidance before making the decision to issue the notice.
  4. We asked the Council to apologise to Ms X, reconsider its decision in line with relevant Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and Ombudsman guidance, and write to Ms X with the outcome. If its decision changes, it should refund any money owed. We also asked it to remind relevant staff to consider the relevant guidance before issuing FPNs. The Council has agreed to do so within four weeks of the final decision.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because the Council has provided a suitable remedy which is in line with the Ombudsman’s guidance.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings