West Lancashire Borough Council (25 014 329)

Category : Environment and regulation > Other

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 04 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s Environmental Health Service. This is because the Council already remedied the injustice during its complaint process, and there is a body better placed to consider Miss X’s complaint.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained about the Council’s investigation into the heating issues at the property she was living in.
  2. She says the Council did not inspect her property, and there was delay and poor communication.
  3. Miss X would like compensation for the distress caused by lack of heating.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. If we are satisfied with an organisation’s actions or proposed actions, we can complete our investigation and issue a decision statement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 30(1B) and s34H(1), as amended)
  3. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Miss X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X first complained to the landlord and letting agent about heating issues, then in the final months of her tenancy complained to the Council.
  2. In the complaint response the Council apologised, saying there were delays in its investigation, and communication could have been better. This is a reasonable and proportionate remedy for the injustice Miss X suffered.
  3. Miss X would like compensation for the ill health and distress she suffered due to the lack of heating, and for travel expenses. These are matters which backdate her complaint to the Council. She is pursuing this with the letting agent and courts, which is reasonable for her to do. This is not something the Council or Ombudsman can consider.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings