Gloucestershire County Council (25 013 266)

Category : Environment and regulation > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Jan 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about damages the Council caused to a hedge. This is because it is reasonable for Mr and Mrs X to pursue their compensation claim by taking the Council to court.

The complaint

  1. Mr and Mrs X complained the Council caused damage to a hedge on their property. They also complained about how the Council responded to the matter.
  2. Mr and Mrs X said the damage impacted on the privacy into their home.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  3. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr and Mrs X complained the Council caused damage to a hedge on their property and wished to pursue a compensation claim.
  2. Our role is to consider complaints of administrative fault. Negligence claims are best decided by an organisation’s insurers, and if needed, where liability is not accepted, then the courts. Only the courts can decide if an organisation was negligent, and if so, make an order for damages. We cannot recommend actions or payments that ‘punish’ an organisation.
  3. I consider it reasonable for Mr and Mrs X to pursue this matter through the courts, either directly or via their home insurer. Only the courts can award compensation, as Mr and Mrs X wish to pursue a claim for. This is not something which is achievable by the Ombudsman.
  4. Additionally, it is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint or insurance claim handling procedures, if we decide not to deal with the substantive issue. Therefore, we will not investigate Mr X’s complaints about the Council’s handling of this matter.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr and Mrs X’s complaint because it is reasonable for them to pursue their compensation claim by taking the Council to court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings